Nuclear time wemake peace with islam how to#

Seventy-five years ago Baha’i leadership issued to the UN a statement, “The Faith of Baha’u’llah: A World Religion.” This summary of the origin, teachings and institutions of the Baha’i Faith reflects its status in 1947. When representatives of 50 countries gathered in 1945 to create a new international organization, the UN, they hoped to “prevent another world war like the one they had just lived through.” Nations “were in ruins, and the world wanted peace.” In a stark 19th century warning, Baha’u’llah wrote: “Should one king rise up against another, all the other kings must arise to deter him.” This structure must evolve into an international order both just and equitable, overseeing Earth’s natural resources, regulating global financial institutions, and rendering absolute power of any individual impossible. But it lacks true peacekeeping authority because of its flawed structure. Its intergovernmental agencies work toward environmentally sustainable development, improved global health and agriculture, children’s welfare and education, gender equality, and much more around the globe. Yet this international body is politically toothless, “ineffective” according to besieged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Positive SignsĪutonomous 19th-century fiefdoms, sheikdoms, and nation-states coalesced into today’s United Nations. It’s a warning about environmental, economic, and social issues that threaten humankind on a global scale. Reality confronts us: “Earth is but one country and mankind its citizens” is more than an observation. These fetters perpetuate shibboleths glorifying nationhood, like “thunderstorms” that “glorify Russia.”

At some point nations must shake off fetters forged over centuries by circumstances long outmoded. We contemplate the uncertainty of our changing future.

Rules even specify how not to torture prisoners of war.

Nuclear time wemake peace with islam how to#

These humanitarian rules for warfare, the ultimate zero-sum game, prescribe how to “humanely” displace, maim, and kill innocent noncombatants–men, women, and children. People die, victims of “conventional” weapons, some of which are “illegal” under the Geneva Conventions. Treaties were signed, the world changed, but war continues. Thermonuclear warheads are far more destructive. Not even survivors of atom bombs fully understand what they survived. From a safe distance, television portrayed the aftermath of this unprecedented horror. I was a child when the first two -the only two - atomic bombs were dropped in war. It hangs by the hairthread of one man’s fraying mind. Today a nuclear Damoclean sword dangles over a world held hostage by a religious fanatic. And let’s not forget persecutions of Jews throughout millennia. Warring factions of Sunni and Shia Islam joined forces to persecute and martyr tens of thousands of Babis and Baha’is in Iran and other Islamic countries. Within the shards of a splintered Christianity, some still exile “heretics,” yet such actions aren’t restricted to Christians. Images of jihads, crusades, inquisitions, witch-burnings, and unmentionable abuses of religious authority come to mind. That includes the possibility of “nuclear holy war.” He is a “Russian Orthodox Christian believer rather than an atheist.” His ideology is “closer to Benito Mussolini’s fascism than Vladimir Lenin’s communism.” Religion News Service reported Putin seeks “full capitulation from Ukraine-both physical and spiritual.” Another writer warned, “faith and force go hand in hand” in the Kremlin. Putin is more than “an ex-KGB officer who wants to revive the Soviet Union,” the Post wrote. “This is how it was in his time,” Putin said, “this is how it is today and will always be.” The saint was Fedor Ushakov, a 19 th-century admiral reputed never to have lost a battle. Vladimir Putin himself “invoked a Russian Orthodox warrior-saint” who called his own battles “thunderstorms” that would “glorify Russia,” the Washington Post reported. “What has been missed among Vladimir Putin’s ranting,” wrote The Guardian, “is the religious dimension in his thinking.” The Wall Street Journal posited, “The Kremlin and the Russian Orthodox Church see Ukraine as part of a cultural dominion to be protected from the values of an encroaching west.” Fox news concurred, suggesting Putin’s war “may have spiritual, religious foundations: ‘Good vs. One, ironically, was a 96-year-old Holocaust survivor. It’s barely a month since Russia invaded Ukraine, a month in which millions have fled and tens of thousands have died.